Now Available:

line

Featured Resources:

line

Newsletter

Email Address:


line

Ask the Expert

Have a question for our resident expert? Email your questions to Rebecca.

« Will A "Do Not Track" List Materialize? | Main | Definitions For the Identity Theft Prevention Program Rule Under FACTA & Questions For Your Organization »

FTC Now Requires Organizations to Have an Identity Theft Prevention Program

Did you know that if you are a U.S. financial organization, *AND/OR* if you have information about your U.S. customers with which identity theft could occur, you are now legally required to have a documented Identity Theft Prevention Program to help prevent identity theft in connection with new and existing accounts?

Yesterday (10/31) the FTC issued the final rules on what organizations must do to prevent identity theft.

"The final rules require each financial institution and creditor that holds any consumer account, or other account for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft, to develop and implement an Identity Theft Prevention Program (Program) for combating identity theft in connection with new and existing accounts. The Program must include reasonable policies and procedures for detecting, preventing, and mitigating identity theft and enable a financial institution or creditor to:

* Identify relevant patterns, practices, and specific forms of activity that are “red flags” signaling possible identity theft and incorporate those red flags into the Program;

* Detect red flags that have been incorporated into the Program;

* Respond appropriately to any red flags that are detected to prevent and mitigate identity theft; and

* Ensure the Program is updated periodically to reflect changes in risks from identity theft.

The agencies also issued guidelines to assist financial institutions and creditors in developing and implementing a Program, including a supplement that provides examples of red flags.

The final rules also require credit and debit card issuers to develop policies and procedures to assess the validity of a request for a change of address that is followed closely by a request for an additional or replacement card. In addition, the final rules require users of consumer reports to develop reasonable policies and procedures to apply when they receive a notice of address discrepancy from a consumer reporting agency."

You can find a copy of the final rule, a 256-page document, here.

Don't let the size of the document scare you away; there is much white space and the font is large. :)

The document has some great guidance. Use it to create your formal identity theft program. Use it within your information security and privacy training sessions for the folks handling, or with access to, personally identifiable information (PII).

Incorporate digestable chunks of information within many ongoing awareness communications about how to spot identity theft red flags. Too many organizations issue a huge, multi-page communication once a year, which most personnel do not even try to start wading through. To get your personnel to read your awareness messages, make them short and interesting...with information that relates to their job responsibilities, or to them personally.

As an example, here is an excerpt from the final rule regarding some identity theft red flags:

"Unusual Use of, or Suspicious Activity Related to, the Covered Account

19. Shortly following the notice of a change of address for a covered account, the institution or creditor receives a request for a new, additional, or replacement card or a cell phone, or for the addition of authorized users on the account.

20. A new revolving credit account is used in a manner commonly associated with known patterns of fraud patterns. For example:

a. The majority of available credit is used for cash advances or merchandise that is easily convertible to cash (e.g., electronics equipment or jewelry); or

b. The customer fails to make the first payment or makes an initial payment but no subsequent payments.

21. A covered account is used in a manner that is not consistent with established patterns of activity on the account. There is, for example:

a. Nonpayment when there is no history of late or missed payments;

b. A material increase in the use of available credit;

c. A material change in purchasing or spending patterns;

d. A material change in electronic fund transfer patterns in connection with a deposit account; or

e. A material change in telephone call patterns in connection with a cellular phone account.

22. A covered account that has been inactive for a reasonably lengthy period of time is used (taking into consideration the type of account, the expected pattern of usage and other relevant factors).

23. Mail sent to the customer is returned repeatedly as undeliverable although transactions continue to be conducted in connection with the customer’s covered account.

24. The financial institution or creditor is notified that the customer is not receiving paper account statements.

25. The financial institution or creditor is notified of unauthorized charges or transactions in connection with a customer’s covered account."


This shows 7 red flags for suspicious account activity. You could target your business units that process customer information, and that have direct contact with customers, for receiving targeted training for these red flags, followed by ongoing awareness communications about these red flags.

You could provide a short computer-based training session, or better yet, a webinar or classroom training, to allow for questions and answers from your learners. You could provide this training within a 15- to 30-minute time period. Follow-up the training with ongoing awareness messages, each about one of the red flags. You could provide one awareness message each week or two, along with examples that would be explicitly applicable to your organization.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realtime-itcompliance.com/type/mt-tb.cgi/562

Comments

The qualifier "*AND/OR* if you have information about your U.S. customers with which identity theft could occur," seems to indicate that this could be most any company that keeps any data. Does a company that keeps CC data fall under this?

I wish they wouldn't be so vague in defining who they are targeting? What about a book club that you are a member of? What if someone steals your info from there and buys books that you get billed for?

I haven't read the doc yet, but is there anything in there to give any clarification?

Great question, Andy! This identity theft program rule is actually a part of FACTA implementation. FACTA generally applies to any organization that handles consumer information.

I will elaborate upon this in my next blog posting later today!

Andy,

To answer your question yes a company that keeps CC data does fall under this. This revision has taken away the ambiguity of previous laws and policy. All companies must do their best to help their customers and to help themselves. Since a deadline date has been put into place of November 2008, large companies who sat on the fence will have to take action sooner to meet the objective. Small to mid-size companies will be in a better position of course.

For more details on this, see my follow-up post, "Definitions For the Identity Theft Prevention Program Rule Under FACTA & Questions For Your Organization" at http://www.realtime-itcompliance.com/laws_regulations/2007/11/definitions_for_the_identity_t.htm.

Post a comment

(All comments are approved by site leader before appearing here. Thanks for commenting!)

line

Rebecca Herold's Bio:

Rebecca Herold,CISSP, CIPP, CISM, CISA, FLMI, has been providing information security, privacy and regulatory assistance and services to organizations from a wide range of industries for over 18 years. Rebecca was instrumental in building the information security and privacy program while at Principal Financial Group, which was awarded the CSI Information Security Program of the Year Award in 1998. IT Security ranked Rebecca as one of the top 59 IT security influencers, and Computerworld put Rebecca their list of the 25 top privacy experts and on their list of the 9 best privacy consulting firms. Rebecca has been CPO for two consulting organizations, and has had her own information privacy, security and compliance business since 2004. Rebecca has written chapters for several books, dozens of articles, and has been writing a monthly privacy column for the CSI Alert newsletter since the beginning of 2001, and is working on her 11th book. Some of her other books include The Privacy Papers, Managing an Information Security and Privacy Awareness and Training Program, The Definitive Guide to Security Inside the Perimeter (Realtime Publishers), The Shortcut Guide to Improving IT Service Support through ITIL (Realtime Publishers), and The Practical Guide to HIPAA Privacy and Security Compliance. In addition, Rebecca is the leader of The Realtime IT Compliance Community where she posts to her IT Compliance weblog. You can contact Rebecca at: rebecca_herold@realtimepublishers.net.