Now Available:

line

Featured Resources:

line

Newsletter

Email Address:


line

Ask the Expert

Have a question for our resident expert? Email your questions to Rebecca.

« Something You Should Know: FTC Is Aggressively Going After Companies With Poor Security | Main | New Nevada Law Explicitly Requires Organizations to Encrypt PII Sent Through Networks »

Increase Business Productivity AND Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions

While participating in a discussion in the Security Catalyst community I posted a message about how much more productive time I have now that I work from my home office as opposed to commuting in to an office building each day. After I finished posting I started thinking about how much more productive most businesses could be if they would establish significant portions of their workforce to work from home.

Just consider my experience.

I'm very thankful that I am now able to have my own business in my home office. I can do most of my work here, and only travel maybe once every month or two for 2 - 4 days at a time. I make frequent use of phone conference meetings, and I don't have anyone just "dropping by" my office to chit-chat.

Compared to when I commuted into Des Moines to work, I save quite a bit of time each day M - F:

~ 1 hour getting ready in the morning

~ 45 minutes driving from my house to parking and getting to my desk

~ 1 hour (this should probably actually be more most days) having drop-ins to my office, chit-chat, lunch (I now eat at my desk while working with no break for lunch), etc.

~ 1 hour driving back home each day (morning commute was quicker because I left the house at 5:30am...before much traffic)

Total time saved per work day = 3 hrs. 45 min. * number of workdays 5 (M - F) = 18 hrs. 45 min. saved per week. This could have been a part time job!

Yes, I definitely put in more work hours now...but considering I save around 19 hours or more of commute/"wasted" time per week, it's a pretty good, productive trade-off...and I now get to spend more time with my family, and I definitely get a little more sleep than I used to!

In addition to increasing my productive work time by 19+ hours per week, I also spend very little on gas for my car...eliminating the carbon dioxide emissions I used to spew into the air. I'm now a "greener" worker!

Just imagine what impact it could have upon both business productivity and the environment if more companies established home workers. Yes, more people are working from their homes than probably than any other time in the past 3 - 4 decades. However, there could be more working from home offices.

There will always be certain types of jobs where people NEED to be in the office to do their work.

And there will always be a need for face-to-face meetings to be held. However, for these, perhaps one or two days a week could be specified for meeting days, with the other days dedicated to just doing work individually and communicating when necessary by phone.

You will also need to consider that certain personalities work better when they are in the highly structured office building environment, and others can work well alone and self-directed. Some of my friends who are CISOs and CIOs have told me that they could never work from a home office because they'd be too tempted to do other things, such as watch TV or do their hobbies. Those types of personalities probably wouldn't be good fits then.

However, I know I work much better within my own home office, better able to focus on getting my business projects done without any temptation at all from other parts of the house. I know a significant portion of th population could also be very productive.

You would need to have strong procedures in place to ensure the security of the business applications, systems and information within the home office and address all the remote working security issues. With appropriate policies, procedures, technologies and good, ongoing awareness and training, though, this is very doable.

Let's consider the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction. According to Sightline Institute an SUV puts out 1.57 pounds of CO2 per mile. Driving a round trip of 60 miles to and from work would equal 94.2 pounds of CO2...gee, that sounds like a lot!

If you could put 100 workers who drive SUVs (very, very common here in the midwest), and commute an average of 60 miles round trip, into home offices, this would save 9420 pounds of CO2 per day!

Yes, there are many, many more variables involved, but looking from a high view, this certainly could make an impact, couldn't it? Not only upon business productivity, but also upon reducing CO2 levels in the atmosphere.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realtime-itcompliance.com/type/mt-tb.cgi/539

Comments

Rebecca,
In one of your blog entries in July you mentioned how scary Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth is. The movie terrified one of your sons so much that you decided to continue watching when he wasn’t around. Let me reassure you that Mr. Gore’s movie is a brilliant example of propaganda that replaces emotionally charged inaccuracies and images for the truth.

Despite what we hear on the six o’clock news, there are many voices of reason that dispute global warming. As a very recent example, the UK High Court ruled that An Inconvenient Truth to be propaganda (see http://newparty.co.uk/articles/inaccuracies-gore.html )

The court cites 11 significant inaccuracies in the movie. In fact, the court disputes the movie’s claim (and central theme to the global warming movement) that CO2 causes global temperature to rise. The High Court states that the inverse is true: An increase in temperature causes an increase in CO2. Therefore, increased CO2 in the atmosphere will not cause global warming.

We are told that we should accept global warming because a "consensus of scientists" uphold the theory of global warming. However, one should not regard consensus as proof of any fact. Science presupposes that facts are facts, regardless of what people believe. Bodies do not follow Newton’s Laws because a bunch of scientists (or failed presidential candidates) say so.

Quite thought-provoking post, A! Thanks for the link.

Post a comment

(All comments are approved by site leader before appearing here. Thanks for commenting!)

line

Rebecca Herold's Bio:

Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CIPP, CISM, CISA, FLMI, has been providing information security, privacy and regulatory assistance and services to organizations from a wide range of industries for the past two decades. Rebecca was instrumental in building the information security and privacy program while at Principal Financial Group, which was awarded the CSI Information Security Program of the Year Award in 1998. IT Security ranked Rebecca as one of the top 59 IT security influencers, and Computerworld put Rebecca their list of the world's best privacy experts and on their list of the best privacy consulting firms in both 2007 and 2008. Rebecca has been CPO for two consulting organizations, and has had her own information privacy, security and compliance business since 2004. Rebecca has written chapters for several books, dozens of articles, and has been writing a monthly privacy column for the CSI Alert newsletter since the beginning of 2001, and is working on her 13th book. Some of her other books include The Privacy Papers, Managing an Information Security and Privacy Awareness and Training Program, The Definitive Guide to Security Inside the Perimeter (Realtime Publishers), The Shortcut Guide to Improving IT Service Support through ITIL (Realtime Publishers), and The Practical Guide to HIPAA Privacy and Security Compliance. In addition, Rebecca is the leader of The Realtime IT Compliance Community where she posts to her IT Compliance weblog. You can contact Rebecca at: rebecca_herold@realtimepublishers.net.